<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Hot Water &#8211; Evacuated Tubes &#8211; Apricus vs Hills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills</link>
	<description>-= Daily Happenings =-</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Apricus Evacuated Tube Solar Hot Water System &#8211; Post Install Review &#187; ClearChain</title>
		<link>http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Apricus Evacuated Tube Solar Hot Water System &#8211; Post Install Review &#187; ClearChain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearchain.com/blog/?p=622#comment-683</guid>
		<description>[...] tubes were still very new to the market. Hence there was only two manufacturers: Hills and Apricus. After a bit of research, Apricus seemed like the best option due to warranty and price. So we contacted a number of Apricus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tubes were still very new to the market. Hence there was only two manufacturers: Hills and Apricus. After a bit of research, Apricus seemed like the best option due to warranty and price. So we contacted a number of Apricus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolarGen</title>
		<link>http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>SolarGen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearchain.com/blog/?p=622#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Hey Sean,

Not sure where you are located but the Solar Choice website could be a good starting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sean,</p>
<p>Not sure where you are located but the Solar Choice website could be a good starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearchain.com/blog/?p=622#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,
Thanks for sharing your research. I&#039;m also looking for a Solar Hot Water system. There is another company called SunTrap. Have you done any investigation about them?
I got a quote from SunTrap which, pricewise sits between Apricus and Hills.
The pump they use is Salmson model no: SB04-15,  energy rating is  22 watt.
They also claim their evacuated tubes are better than all others in the market.
Would be interesting to hear other people&#039;s view on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,<br />
Thanks for sharing your research. I&#8217;m also looking for a Solar Hot Water system. There is another company called SunTrap. Have you done any investigation about them?<br />
I got a quote from SunTrap which, pricewise sits between Apricus and Hills.<br />
The pump they use is Salmson model no: SB04-15,  energy rating is  22 watt.<br />
They also claim their evacuated tubes are better than all others in the market.<br />
Would be interesting to hear other people&#8217;s view on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.clearchain.com/blog/posts/solar-hot-water-evacuated-tubes-apricus-vs-hills#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearchain.com/blog/?p=622#comment-441</guid>
		<description>I have the apricus system. I have been involved in the sustainability industry for a couple of years now, which led me to purchase the Apricus system ovetr Hills (personal choice - both have there good and bad points) Sometimes when the pump is on there is a whistle ? There is a noise which increases in tone and then suddenly drops and lasts until the pump automatically switches off , it doesn&#039;t normally occur first thing in the morning or even later in the afternoon and even in the middle of the day when the temperature is hot . It appears to be coming from the tank , cannot hear anything from the pump.
I have also noted changes in water temp in the shower on a couple of occasions lately. Can anyone tell me what they think the problem may be? Im keen on sustainability and I think its a good system but I would like it to actually work properly. It was not cheap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the apricus system. I have been involved in the sustainability industry for a couple of years now, which led me to purchase the Apricus system ovetr Hills (personal choice &#8211; both have there good and bad points) Sometimes when the pump is on there is a whistle ? There is a noise which increases in tone and then suddenly drops and lasts until the pump automatically switches off , it doesn&#8217;t normally occur first thing in the morning or even later in the afternoon and even in the middle of the day when the temperature is hot . It appears to be coming from the tank , cannot hear anything from the pump.<br />
I have also noted changes in water temp in the shower on a couple of occasions lately. Can anyone tell me what they think the problem may be? Im keen on sustainability and I think its a good system but I would like it to actually work properly. It was not cheap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

